We put the Xiaomi 13T through our rigorous SBMARK Audio test suite to measure its performance in both recording sound using the built-in microphones, and playing audio through its speakers.
F'din ir-reviżjoni, aħna ser nkissru kif wettaq f'varjetà ta 'testijiet u diversi każijiet ta' użu komuni.

Ħarsa ġenerali


L-ispeċifikazzjonijiet ewlenin tal-awdjo jinkludu:

  • Two speakers (top front, bottom side)
  • L-ebda output tal-awdjo Jack
  • Teknoloġija Dolby Atmos

Daqq

Prosperità

  • Prestazzjoni dinamika tajba, anke fil-volum massimu
  • Very few artifacts

Kontra

  • Disappointing space performance
  • Lack of heat in the low-mid range
  • Lack of both high-end and low-end extension

Reġistrazzjoni

Prosperità

  • Great intelligibility, thanks to the brightness of the tonal balance
  • Good and precise envelope yield
  • Prestazzjoni spazjali tajba b'mod ġenerali

Kontra

  • Aggressive performance, due to the strong hiss in the upper treble
  • Slightly thin sound, due to lack of bass below 200 Hz and prominence of upper treble
  • Prestazzjoni fqira tal-artifact

The Xiaomi 13T delivered average performance for its class in the SBMARK Audio tests, and was overall on par with its predecessor Xiaomi 12T. The audio playback experience was mostly decent but unremarkable. The built-in speakers provided good dynamic performance, even at high volume levels, and unwanted audio artifacts were well under control. Overall, playback results were better when watching movies and slightly worse when listening to music and gaming.

When recording, the microphones pick up a lot of upper treble harshness, which may tire your ears. Recordings often sounded harsh and overly compressed, especially at high volumes. As a recording device, the 13T worked best with the memo app and in the office. The scores with selfie and main camera were slightly lower.

Sommarju tat-test

Dwar it-testijiet tal-awdjo SBMARK: Għall-punteġġ u l-analiżi fir-reviżjonijiet tal-awdjo tal-ismartphone tagħna, l-inġiniera SBMARK iwettqu serje ta 'testijiet oġġettivi u jagħmlu aktar minn 20 siegħa ta' evalwazzjoni perċettiv taħt kundizzjonijiet tal-laboratorju kkontrollati.
(Għal aktar dettalji dwar il-protokoll ta’ daqq tagħna, ikklikkja hawn; għal aktar dettalji dwar il-protokoll ta’ reġistrazzjoni tagħna, ikklikkja hawn.)

It-taqsima li ġejja tiġbor elementi ewlenin tal-ittestjar u l-analiżi komprensivi tagħna mwettqa fil-laboratorji SBMARK. Evalwazzjonijiet dettaljati tal-prestazzjoni fil-forma ta' rapporti huma disponibbli fuq talba. Toqgħodx lura milli tikkuntattjana.

Kif huwa magħmul il-punteġġ tal-plejbek tal-awdjo

L-inġiniera ta’ SBMARK jittestjaw id-daqq permezz ta’ kelliema tal-ismartphone, li l-prestazzjoni tagħhom tiġi evalwata fil-laboratorji tagħna u f’kundizzjonijiet tal-ħajja reali, bl-użu ta’ apps u settings awtomatiċi.

Playback performance was average overall, with decent tonal balance. Treble presence was correct, but the treble sounded slightly thin and resonant. The midrange lacked warmth, and while the bass presence generally made up for the insufficient low-midrange, the upper bass was slightly fuzzy and the low-end extension wasn’t deep enough. Dynamic performance was good, with fairly crisp attack, proper bass accuracy, and decent power. The built-in speakers produce a medium-amplitude soundstage, and the image may appear slightly off-center in some use cases, such as gaming. As a result, the localizability of individual sound sources was not as good as it could have been, with limited accuracy. Distance rendering wasn’t particularly accurate either, with voices often sounding slightly distant. This also had a negative impact on depth rendering, as the distant foreground limited the separation of distinct planes in the virtual soundstage.

The distribution of volume steps was consistent, although the first volume step seemed slightly noisy. On the plus side, this ensures good intelligibility at minimum volume, even with highly dynamic content, such as classical music. The maximum volume was quite high. In normal use, very few unwanted artifacts were noticed, such as slight distortion and slight pumping at maximum volume. Our testers found that the bottom speaker could easily be blocked during gaming, but other than muting the right channel, this wasn’t detrimental to the audio experience.

Isma 'l-prestazzjoni tal-plejbek tal-ismartphone ittestjat f'dan il-paragun ma' xi wħud mill-kompetituri tiegħu:

Reġistrazzjonijiet ta' smartphones li jdoqqu wħud mill-binarji tal-mużika tagħna f'60 LAeq f'ambjent anekoiku bl-użu ta' 2 mikrofoni f'konfigurazzjoni AB, f'30 ċm

Here’s how the Xiaomi 13T performs in playback usage cases compared to its competitors:

Logħba ta' punteġġi ta' każi ta' użu

Il-punteġġ tat-Timbre jirrappreżenta l-kwalità li biha telefon jirriproduċi l-ħoss tul il-firxa tonali kollha li tinstema' u jqis id-dipendenza tal-bass, midrange, treble, tal-bilanċ tonali u tal-volum. Huwa l-aktar attribut importanti għar-riproduzzjoni.

Rispons tal-frekwenza tad-daqq tal-mużika

Grafika ta 'rispons tal-frekwenza ta' 1/12 ottava, li tkejjel il-qawwa ta 'kull output ta' frekwenza mill-ismartphone meta tilgħab mewġa sine pura f'ambjent anekoiku.

Il-punteġġ Dynamics ikejjel l-eżattezza tal-bidliet fil-livell tal-enerġija tas-sorsi tal-ħoss, bħal kemm tiġi riprodotta b'mod preċiż nota tal-baxx jew il-ħoss ta 'impatt ta' drum.

Attributi sekondarji ta 'testijiet spazjali jinkludu l-identifikazzjoni tal-post ta' ħoss speċifiku, il-bilanċ pożizzjonali tiegħu, id-distanza u l-amplitudni.

Il-punteġġ tal-volum jirrappreżenta l-volum ġenerali ta 'smartphone u kemm il-volum jiżdied u jonqos bla xkiel abbażi tal-input tal-utent.

Hawn huma xi livelli ta' pressjoni tal-ħoss (SPLs) imkejla meta nilqgħu r-reġistrazzjonijiet kampjuni tagħna ta' hip-hop u mużika klassika fil-volum massimu:

hip hop Classic
Xiaomi 13T 74.2 dBA 70.4 dBA
Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro 77 dBA 76.6 dBA
GooglePixel8 74.8 dBA 70.1 dBA

Il-graff li ġej turi l-bidliet gradwali fil-volum li jmorru minn minimu għal massimu. Nistennew li dawn il-bidliet ikunu konsistenti fil-firxa kollha, sabiex iż-żidiet kollha fil-volum jaqblu mal-aspettattivi tal-utenti:

Konsistenza tal-volum tal-mużika

Din il-grafika tal-linja turi l-volum relattiv ta 'daqq kontra l-inkrement tal-volum magħżul mill-utent, imkejjel f'żidiet ta' volum differenti b'ħoss roża korrelatat f'kaxxa anekoika rreġistrata fuq l-assi f'0.20 metri.

Il-punteġġ Artifacts ikejjel il-punt sa fejn il-ħoss huwa affettwat minn diversi tipi ta 'distorsjoni. Aktar ma jkun għoli l-punteġġ, inqas ikun notevoli d-disturbi tal-ħoss. Jistgħu jseħħu distorsjonijiet minħabba l-ipproċessar tal-ħoss fl-apparat u l-kwalità tal-kelliema.

Distorsjoni armonika totali waqt il-daqq (volum massimu)

Din il-grafika turi distorsjoni armonika totali u storbju fil-medda ta 'frekwenza li tinstema'.
Jirrappreżenta d-distorsjoni u l-istorbju tal-apparat li qed jilgħab is-sinjal tat-test tagħna (0 dB Fs, Sweep Sine f'kaxxa anekoika f'40 ċm) fil-volum massimu tal-apparat.

Kif huwa magħmul il-punteġġ tar-reġistrazzjoni tal-awdjo

L-inġiniera ta 'SBMARK jittestjaw ir-reġistrazzjoni billi jevalwaw fajls irreġistrati fuq tagħmir awdjo ta' referenza. Dawn ir-reġistrazzjonijiet isiru fil-laboratorji tagħna u f'kundizzjonijiet tal-ħajja reali, bl-użu ta 'apps u settings default.

The tonal performance during recording was good overall. Treble performance was satisfactory, despite a slight lack of treble extension. The midrange sounded pleasant but was slightly lacking in low-midrange compared to the sweeping highs. This resulted in a tonal balance that was a little too treble-focused. Dynamic performance was good, with accurate envelope rendering in most use cases, except at high sound pressure levels, such as at concerts, where compression had a negative impact. With background noise hiss in urban use cases, the signal-to-noise ratio was very inconsistent. In quieter environments there was still some hissing, but the signal-to-noise ratio was much better. Intelligibility remained consistent across all use cases.

The microphones captured a wide soundstage when using the memo app, but the width was slightly reduced with the selfie and main camera apps. Despite some occasional blurring, localizability was very good in all use cases and distance rendering was realistic. Although the recording volume was slightly higher than average, objective measurements showed problems when recording at high sound pressure levels, such as during noisy events. Artifact performance could have been better, with noticeable treble hiss in all apps except the Memo app. Our testers also noticed some pumping on louder content, as well as strong distortion. The underlying tonal balance was aggressive, mainly due to the sibilant upper treble. This produced a rather intrusive background sound, especially when recording in urban environments.

Here’s how the Xiaomi 13T performs in recording use cases compared to its competitors:

Ir-reġistrazzjoni ta' punteġġi ta' każi ta' użu

Il-punteġġ tat-Timbre jirrappreżenta kemm telefon jaqbad ħsejjes fil-firxa tonali li tinstema' u jqis il-bass, il-mids, it-treble u l-bilanċ tonali. Huwa l-aktar attribut importanti għar-reġistrazzjoni.

Reazzjoni tal-frekwenza tal-vidjo tal-ħajja

Grafika tar-rispons tal-frekwenza ta '1/12 ottava, li tkejjel il-qawwa ta' kull frekwenza maqbuda mill-smartphone waqt li tirreġistra mewġa sine pura f'ambjent anekoiku.

Il-punteġġ tad-Dynamics ikejjel l-eżattezza tal-bidliet fil-livell tal-enerġija tas-sorsi tal-ħoss, bħal kemm huma riprodotti b'mod preċiż il-plożivi tal-vuċi (p, tek, per eżempju). Il-punteġġ iqis ukoll il-proporzjon tas-sinjal għall-istorbju (SNR), bħal kemm il-vuċi prinċipali hija qawwija meta mqabbla mal-istorbju fl-isfond.

Attributi sekondarji għall-ittestjar spazjali jinkludu l-identifikazzjoni tal-post ta 'ħoss speċifiku, il-bilanċ pożizzjonali tiegħu, id-distanza, u l-amplitudni fuq fajls awdjo rreġistrati.

Direttiva ta' reġistrazzjoni

Grafika tad-direttività tal-ismartphone waqt ir-reġistrazzjoni tas-sinjali tat-test bl-użu tal-app tal-kamera, bil-kamera prinċipali. Jirrappreżenta l-enerġija akustika (f'dB) meta mqabbla mal-angolu tal-inċidenza tas-sors tal-ħoss. (Normalizzat għall-angolu ta '0 °, quddiem l-apparat.)

Il-punteġġ tal-loudness jirrappreżenta kemm l-awdjo fuq il-fajls irreġistrati huwa normalizzat u kemm l-apparat jimmaniġġa tajjeb ambjenti storbjużi, bħal kunċerti elettroniċi, waqt ir-reġistrazzjoni.

Hawn huma l-livelli tal-ħoss irreġistrati fil-fajls tal-awdjo u tal-vidjo, imkejla f'LUFS (Loudness Unit Full Scale); Bħala referenza, nistennew li l-livelli tal-volum ikunu ogħla minn -24 LUFS għall-kontenut irreġistrat:

Laqgħa Vidjows dwar il-ħajja Selfie videos Memorandum
Xiaomi 13T -28.7 LUFS -20.9 LUFS -19.3 LUFS -22.8 LUFS
Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro -33.5 LUFS -24.4 LUFS -19.2 LUFS -28.4 LUFS
GooglePixel8 -26.1 LUFS -20.8 LUFS -18.9 LUFS -19.9 LUFS

Il-punteġġ Artifacts ikejjel sa liema punt il-ħsejjes irreġistrati huma affettwati minn diversi tipi ta 'distorsjonijiet. Aktar ma jkun għoli l-punteġġ, inqas ikun notevoli d-disturbi tal-ħoss. Jistgħu jseħħu distorsjonijiet minħabba l-ipproċessar tal-ħoss fl-apparat u l-kwalità tal-mikrofoni, kif ukoll l-immaniġġjar tal-utent, bħal kif jinżamm it-telefon.

F'dan il-paragun tal-awdjo tista' tisma' kif dan l-ismartphone jimmaniġġja l-istorbju tar-riħ meta mqabbel mal-kompetituri tiegħu:

matriċi (3) {
[“Xiaomi 13T”]=> string(64) “resources/Xiaomi/Xiaomi13TV2.2/Xiaomi13T_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Nubia Redmagic 8 Pro”]=> string(72) “resources/Xiaomi/Xiaomi13TV2.2/NubiaRedmagic8Pro_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Google Pixel 8”]=> string(67) “resources/Xiaomi/Xiaomi13TV2.2/GooglePixel8_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a” }

Reġistrazzjonijiet ta' kampjun ta' diskors b'ħoss fl-isfond ħafif, espost għal riħ turbulenti ta' 5 m/s

L-isfond jevalwa kif naturalment id-diversi ħsejjes madwar vuċi jingħaqdu flimkien fil-fajl tar-reġistrazzjoni tal-vidjo. Pereżempju, meta tirreġistra diskors f'avveniment, l-isfond m'għandux jinterferixxi mal-vuċi prinċipali, iżda għandu jipprovdi kuntest għall-ambjent tal-madwar.

Let's talk about "Xiaomi 13T Audio test" with our community!
Ibda Thread ġdid

Philip Owell

Blogger professjonali, hawn biex iġiblek kontenut ġdid u interessanti kull darba li żżur il-blog tagħna.