Test tal-awdjo Vivo X100 Pro

Poġġejna l-Vivo
F'din ir-reviżjoni, aħna ser nkissru kif wettaq f'varjetà ta 'testijiet u diversi każijiet ta' użu komuni.

Ħarsa ġenerali

L-ispeċifikazzjonijiet ewlenin tal-awdjo jinkludu:

• Żewġ kelliema (fuq quddiem taħt l-iskrin, naħa t'isfel)
• Ebda output awdjo jack

Daqq

Reġistrazzjoni

With a SBMARK Audio score of 134, the Vivo X100 Pro delivered fairly average performance in our tests. Distortion was noticeable when playing audio at high volumes, but our audio experts liked the solid tonal performance when playing at nominal volume, despite the lack of bass extension. The recording performance was overall very constant and the timbre transmitted by the microphones was considered particularly pleasant and natural. Thanks to effective wind noise reduction, the X100 Pro performed very well when recording in windy conditions, but the Vivo is one of the few Ultra-Premium phones not to offer an audio zoom function.

In playback tests, the X100 Pro performed better for gaming, but results were close when listening to music or watching movies. Recording scores were higher when using the Memo app. Selfie videos were about the same level, but main camera videos and meeting room recordings fell slightly lower.

Sommarju tat-test

Dwar it-testijiet tal-awdjo SBMARK: Għall-punteġġ u l-analiżi fir-reviżjonijiet tal-awdjo tal-ismartphone tagħna, l-inġiniera SBMARK iwettqu serje ta 'testijiet oġġettivi u jagħmlu aktar minn 20 siegħa ta' evalwazzjoni perċettiv taħt kundizzjonijiet tal-laboratorju kkontrollati.
(Għal aktar dettalji dwar il-protokoll ta’ daqq tagħna, ikklikkja hawn; għal aktar dettalji dwar il-protokoll ta’ reġistrazzjoni tagħna, ikklikkja hawn.)
It-taqsima li ġejja tiġbor flimkien elementi ewlenin tal-ittestjar u l-analiżi komprensivi tagħna mwettqa fil-laboratorji SBMARK. Evalwazzjonijiet dettaljati tal-prestazzjoni fil-forma ta' rapporti huma disponibbli fuq talba. Toqgħodx lura milli tikkuntattjana.

In our tests, the Vivo X100 Pro delivered an overall decent tone, with great treble extension and a decent midrange but only average bass. Dynamic performance was good, thanks to decent attack and good bass precision and power. The built-in speakers offered a good sense of spaciousness in all use cases. Thanks to the wide stereo soundstage, even individual sound sources were easy to locate. Both distance and depth rendering were quite accurate.

Our testers found that the minimum volume setting was slightly too low, which made it difficult to hear low-volume passages in highly dynamic content, such as classical music. Maximum volume was quite good, but the distribution of volume levels from minimum to maximum could have been more consistent. In terms of playback artifacts, the Vivo delivered an average performance. At nominal volume it seemed free of artifacts. However, at maximum volume, our testers noticed high levels of distortion when gaming, watching movies, or playing music. While gaming, it was quite easy to accidentally cover the right speaker. That said, the effect on sound quality was rather negligible.

Isma 'l-prestazzjoni tal-plejbek tal-ismartphone ittestjat f'dan il-paragun ma' xi wħud mill-kompetituri tiegħu:

Hawn kif jaħdem il-Vivo X100 Pro f'każijiet ta' użu ta' daqq meta mqabbel mal-kompetituri tiegħu:

Hawn huma xi livelli ta' pressjoni tal-ħoss (SPLs) imkejla meta nilqgħu r-reġistrazzjonijiet kampjuni tagħna ta' hip-hop u mużika klassika fil-volum massimu:

Il-graff li ġej turi l-bidliet gradwali fil-volum li jmorru minn minimu għal massimu. Nistennew li dawn il-bidliet ikunu konsistenti fil-firxa kollha, sabiex iż-żidiet kollha fil-volum jaqblu mal-aspettattivi tal-utenti:

In recording tests, the X100 Pro offered a satisfying tonal balance in urban environments, with a natural and pleasant midrange. In both urban and domestic scenarios, the timbre however seemed to lack clarity and brightness. When recording loud events, such as concerts, tonal balance remained good, but our experts noted superior treble. Tonal balance consistency was good across all test use cases, regardless of the app or camera used. The device offered an efficient signal-to-noise ratio in most test scenarios, and concert recordings highlighted sharp attacks and accurate envelope.

The recorded sound stage was quite large with the main camera but noticeably reduced when recording a selfie video, as on many smartphones. Remote performance was good in all use cases. In our real-life tests recordings were perceived as nice and loud with the main camera and memo apps, but slightly quieter with the front camera. That said, our lab measurements showed slightly weaker loudness performance. On the plus side, the Vivo is particularly resistant to high sound pressure levels, which can occur at noisy events, such as concerts. Unwanted artifacts were controlled well during recording, with only some slight clipping on screaming vocals and very subtle compression on recordings at high sound pressure levels. The background was quite natural, thanks mainly to a balanced midrange. However, a little more presence in the upper spectrum would have been welcome.

Hawn kif jaħdem il-Vivo X100 Pro fir-reġistrazzjoni ta' każijiet ta' użu meta mqabbel mal-kompetituri tiegħu:

Hawn huma l-livelli tal-ħoss irreġistrati fil-fajls tal-awdjo u tal-vidjo, imkejla f'LUFS (Loudness Unit Full Scale); Bħala referenza, nistennew li l-livelli tal-volum ikunu ogħla minn -24 LUFS għall-kontenut irreġistrat:

F'dan il-paragun tal-awdjo tista' tisma' kif dan l-ismartphone jimmaniġġja l-istorbju tar-riħ meta mqabbel mal-kompetituri tiegħu:

matriċi (3) {
[“Vivo X100 Pro”] => string(65) “resources/Vivo/X100ProV2.2/VivoX100ProV22_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Xiaomi 13T”]=> string(69) “resources/Vivo/X100ProV2.2/XiaomiXiaomi13TV22_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a”
[“Google Pixel 8”] => string(66) “resources/Vivo/X100ProV2.2/GooglePixel8V22_MicrophoneArtifacts.m4a” }