We subjected the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) to our rigorous SBMARK Selfie test suite to measure its performance in photos and videos from an end-user perspective. This article explains how the device performed in a variety of tests and different common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an extract of the acquired data.
Ħarsa ġenerali
Speċifikazzjonijiet ewlenin tal-kamera ta 'quddiem:
- 40 MP 1 / 2.82 ″ sensor
- apertura f / 2.2
- Focal length equivalent to 26 mm
- PDAF
- 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30 fps
Prosperità
- Espożizzjoni tajba u firxa dinamika wiesgħa fir-ritratti u l-vidjows
- Bilanċ tal-abjad preċiż u kulur sabiħ
- Fast and repeatable autofocus
- Nice bokeh effect with an accurate estimate of the depth
- Kulur sabiħ u ton tal-ġilda fil-video
- High levels of detail in the video
kontra
- High levels of image noise
- Fond kemmxejn limitat tal-kamp
- Ghost, halo and ring artifacts
- Occasional autofocus instability in the video
- Camera shake while walking while recording video
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) is among the best phones we’ve tested for taking selfies and improves slightly over its predecessor S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos). The improvements are most noticeable in terms of depth of field, texture and video. The downside is that the noise levels are higher than the previous model and the video stabilization is less effective.
This outdoor selfie displays accurate white balance and exposure, as well as a good level of detail.
When shooting still images, the camera handles exposure well, capturing good target exposure on portraits and a wide dynamic range in high-contrast scenes. Colors are beautiful, with neutral white balance and natural skin tones. However, noise levels are high in all conditions, especially in brighter outdoor light, where we can see luminance noise in the background and in the shadows. Autofocus is fast enough and repeatable enough, but depth of field is somewhat limited, which can result in subjects being blurred in group selfies. Our testers also observed some image artifacts, including ghosting, halos, and ringing.
In video mode, exposure and color are handled just as well as in photos, but we did notice some instability in autofocus and the depth of field is limited as in photo mode. Textures are rendered well, with a high level of detail, but the main drawback of the camera in video mode is the ineffective video stabilization when walking while recording. In this type of situation, you will notice a lot of camera shake in video shooting.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) vs Ultra-Premium selfie scores
Din it-tabella tqabbel il-punteġġi ġenerali tar-ritratti u l-vidjows SBMARK Selfie bejn tagħmir u referenzi ttestjati. Il-punteġġi medji u massimi tas-segment tal-prezz huma indikati wkoll. Il-punteġġi medji u massimi għal kull segment tal-prezz huma kkalkulati abbażi tad-database tal-apparat SBMARK.
Sommarju tat-test
Dwar it-testijiet selfie SBMARK: Għall-punteġġ u l-analiżi, l-inġiniera SBMARK jaqbdu u jevalwaw aktar minn 1,500 immaġini tat-test kemm f'ambjenti kkontrollati tal-laboratorju kif ukoll xeni naturali ta 'barra, ġewwa u b'dawl baxx, billi jużaw is-settings default tal-kamera ta' quddiem. Il-protokoll fotografiku huwa ddisinjat biex iqis il-ħtiġijiet tal-utent u huwa bbażat fuq xenarji tipiċi ta 'sparar, bħal close-ups u selfies tal-grupp. Il-valutazzjoni ssir billi tispezzjona viżwalment immaġini Cons referenza xena naturali u tagħmel kejl oġġettiv fuq immaġini grafiċi maqbuda fil-laboratorju taħt kundizzjonijiet tad-dawl differenti minn 1 sa 1,000+ lux u temperaturi tal-kulur minn 2,300K sa 6,500K. Għal aktar informazzjoni dwar il-Protokoll SBMARK Selfie Test, jekk jogħġbok ikklikkja hawn. Aktar dettalji dwar kif nirvalutaw il-kameras tal-ismartphone jistgħu jinstabu hawn. It-taqsima li ġejja tiġbor l-elementi ewlenin tal-ittestjar u l-analiżi komprensivi ta’ SBMARK. Evalwazzjonijiet tal-prestazzjoni komprensivi huma disponibbli fuq talba. Ikkuntattjana biex issir taf kif tirċievi rapport sħiħ.
ritratt
130
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
144
Huawei P50 Pro
Huawei P50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) vs Ultra-Premium photo scores
It-testijiet tar-ritratti janalizzaw l-attributi tal-kwalità tal-immaġini bħall-espożizzjoni, il-kulur, in-nisġa u l-istorbju taħt diversi kundizzjonijiet tad-dawl. Il-firxa tal-fokus u l-preżenza ta 'artifacts fuq l-immaġini kollha maqbuda taħt kundizzjonijiet kontrollati tal-laboratorju u fi stampi tal-ħajja reali huma wkoll evalwati. Dawn l-attributi kollha għandhom impatt sinifikanti fuq il-kwalità finali tal-immaġini maqbuda bl-apparat ittestjat u jistgħu jgħinu biex jifhmu s-saħħiet u d-dgħufijiet ewlenin tal-kamera.
Espożizzjoni
88
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
90
Huawei P50 Pro
Huawei P50 Pro
kulur
tnejn u disgħin
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
100
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Pixel 6 Pro
L-espożizzjoni u l-kulur huma l-attributi ewlenin għal immaġini teknikament tajbin. Għall-espożizzjoni, l-attribut ewlieni evalwat huwa l-luminożità tal-wiċċ f'diversi każijiet ta 'użu u kundizzjonijiet tad-dawl. Fatturi oħra evalwati huma l-kuntrast u l-firxa dinamika, eż. il-ħila li tagħmel id-dettalji viżibbli kemm fiż-żoni ċari kif ukoll skuri tal-immaġni. Ir-ripetibbiltà hija importanti wkoll għaliex turi l-kapaċità tal-kamera li tagħti l-istess rendering meta tiġbid immaġini konsekuttivi wara xulxin.
Għall-kulur, l-attributi tal-kwalità tal-immaġni analizzati huma l-għoti tat-ton tal-ġilda, il-bilanċ tal-abjad, l-isfumatura tal-kulur u r-ripetibbiltà.
In this difficult backlit scene, the S22 Ultra manages good exposure and nice contrast on both sides. The camera also does a good job of keeping details on the brighter background, even if you notice some clipping. There are slightly better details in the background of the S21 Ultra’s image, but the face exposure is brighter on the S22 Ultra. Compared to the iPhone, the S22 Ultra exhibits better highlight retention and contrast.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), good exposure on both sides, good retention of background highlights
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), good exposure on lighter skin, slight underexposure on darker skin, good retention of background highlights
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, good exposure on lighter skin, slight underexposure on darker skin, slight overexposure on background
In this close-up, the two Samsung devices offer very similar exposure. Compared to the iPhone, the background cutout is less strong and the contrast is better. Facial exposure is a bit darker, though.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), good exposure on the face, slightly overexposed sky
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), good exposure on the face, slightly overexposed sky
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, good exposure on the face, overexposed sky
In this graph, you can see that the S22 Ultra offers good exposure in all conditions. Overall exposure is better than the comparison devices.
This graph shows the brightness measured on the 18% gray spot of the Colorchecker® graph versus the light level (in lux). The white area represents the region where the brightness is considered correct.
In this scene, both Samsungs produce fairly neutral white balance and beautiful skin tones. The red wall in the background is more saturated on the iPhone but the skin tones are too red too.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), neutral white balance, accurate color rendering
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), neutral white balance, accurate color rendering
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, warmer white balance, slightly reddish skin tone
Under interior lighting, the white balance is more neutral on the iPhone, but the skin tones are still too red. Both Samsung phones once again produce very similar colors, with a cooler color cast and more neutral skin tones.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), natural complexion, neutral white balance
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), Natural Skin Tones, Neutral White Balance
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, warmer white balance, slightly reddish skin tone
Iffoka
95
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
97
Huawei P50 Pro
Huawei P50 Pro
It-testijiet tal-fokus awtomatiku jevalwaw l-eżattezza tal-iffukar fuq il-wiċċ tas-suġġett, ir-ripetibbiltà tal-fokus preċiż, u l-fond tal-kamp. Filwaqt li fond baxx ta 'kamp jista' jkun sabiħ għal selfie b'suġġett wieħed jew shot mill-qrib, jista 'jkun problematiku f'kundizzjonijiet speċifiċi bħal selfies ta' grupp; iż-żewġ sitwazzjonijiet huma ttestjati. L-eżattezza tal-fokus hija evalwata wkoll fl-immaġini reali kollha meħuda, minn 30 ċm sa 150 ċm, u f'kundizzjonijiet ta 'dawl baxx sa barra.
All three comparison devices are equipped with autofocus systems in the front camera, which allows them to focus correctly on different distances to the subject. In the focus range graph below, we can see that all three devices provide focused images over all distances to the tested subject (any acuity greater than 80% is considered to be in focus).
This graph shows the sharpness versus shooting distance at a light level of 1000 lux.
The depth of field of the S22 Ultra is wider than that of the S21 Ultra but is still somewhat limited. Background subjects in group photos tend to be slightly out of focus. In comparison, the background is slightly sharper on the iPhone 13 Pro Max.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), shallow depth of field
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: precise autofocus, wide depth of field
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), shallow depth of field
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), crop: precise autofocus, slightly limited depth of field
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, shallow depth of field
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, crop: precise autofocus, wide depth of field
struttura
74
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
79
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
It-testijiet tal-konsistenza janalizzaw il-livell ta’ dettall u n-nisġa tas-suġġetti f’immaġini meħuda fil-laboratorju kif ukoll f’xenarji tal-ħajja reali. Għal shots naturali, tingħata attenzjoni speċjali lil-livell ta 'dettall fil-karatteristiċi tal-wiċċ, bħall-għajnejn. Il-kejl oġġettiv jitwettaq fuq immaġini tal-mapep meħuda taħt diversi kundizzjonijiet tad-dawl minn 1 sa 1000 lux u tipi differenti ta 'kundizzjonijiet ta' firxa dinamika. Il-mapep użati huma ċ-ċart proprjetarja SBMARK (DMC) u ċ-ċart Dead Leaves.
Evoluzzjoni tas-sharpness tan-nisġa bil-livell ta 'illuminanza
Din il-grafika turi l-evoluzzjoni tas-sharpness tan-nisġa bil-livell lux għal żewġ kundizzjonijiet tas-siġillar. Is-sharpness tan-nisġa titkejjel fuq il-graff tal-Weraq Mejjet fl-issettjar tal-Ħerqa Mejta Close-up.
Our lab measurements show that the texture sharpness on the S22 Ultra is greater than the comparison devices for most conditions, except in very bright and very low light.
Under internal lighting, the S22 Ultra produces better details than the iPhone. Textures also look more natural than on the S21 Ultra.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), internal structure
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: high levels of detail
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), internal structure
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), crop: good fine detail
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, internal structure
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, crop: good fine detail
storbju
52
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
90
Huawei P40 Pro
Huawei P40 Pro
It-testijiet tal-istorbju janalizzaw diversi attributi tal-istorbju bħall-intensità, il-kromatiċità, il-qamħ u n-nisġa fuq immaġini tal-ħajja reali kif ukoll stampi grafiċi meħuda fil-laboratorju. Għal stampi naturali, tingħata attenzjoni speċjali lill-istorbju fuq l-uċuħ, iżda wkoll fuq żoni skuri u f'kundizzjonijiet ta 'firxa dinamika għolja. Kejl oġġettiv jitwettaq fuq stampi grafiċi meħuda taħt kundizzjonijiet varji minn 1 sa 1000 lux u tipi differenti ta 'kundizzjonijiet ta' firxa dinamika. Il-graff użat huwa l-grafika SBMARK Dead Leaves u kejl standardizzat bħal storbju viżwali derivat minn ISO 15739.
When shooting outdoors, the noise levels on the S22 Ultra are higher than on comparison phones. Noise is more intrusive in the shadows and background.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), external noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: high levels of background noise and shadows
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), external noise
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), crop: light luminance noise on background and shadows
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, external noise
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, crop: almost no visible luminance noise
Things change indoors and in low light, where noise remains visible but is similar to the S21 Ultra and less intrusive than the Apple phone.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), internal noise
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: quite visible noise on the face and walls
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), internal noise
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), crop: quite visible noise on the face and walls
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, internal noise
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, crop: slight noise on the face, loud noise on the walls
Oġġetti manifatturati
82
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
87
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Pixel 6 Pro
L-evalwazzjoni tal-artifact teżamina sfumatura tal-lenti, aberrazzjonijiet kromatiċi, kejl tad-distorsjoni fuq it-tikka u ċ-ċart MTF, u l-kejl taċ-ċrieki fuq iċ-ċart SFR fil-laboratorju. Tingħata attenzjoni partikolari, fost affarijiet oħra, lill-ghosting, kwantizzazzjoni, halos u varjazzjonijiet ta 'sfumaturi fuq il-wiċċ. Iktar ma jkun sever u frekwenti l-artifatt, iktar ikun kbir it-tnaqqis tal-punt mill-punteġġ. L-artifacts ewlenin osservati u t-telf tal-punt korrispondenti huma elenkati hawn taħt.
Pieni ewlenin għal artifacts fotografiċi
Ghost artifacts can be noticeable when capturing high-contrast scenes or in low-light conditions. Our testers also observed some ringing.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), artifacts
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: ghosting on moving elements
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), artifacts
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), crop: ring on high contrast edges
Il-bokeh jiġi ttestjat f'mod dedikat, ġeneralment f'modalità ritratt jew apertura, u analizzat billi tispezzjona viżwalment l-immaġini kollha maqbuda fil-laboratorju u taħt kundizzjonijiet naturali. L-għan huwa li tirriproduċi fotografija ta 'ritratti komparabbli ma' dik meħuda b'DSLR u b'apertura wiesgħa. L-attributi ewlenin tal-kwalità tal-immaġini li għandek toqgħod attent għalihom huma l-istima tal-fond, l-artifacts, il-gradjent ta 'ċajpra, u l-forma ta' spotlight ta 'ċajpra tal-bokeh. L-attributi tal-kwalità tal-immaġni tar-ritratti (espożizzjoni, kulur, nisġa) jitqiesu wkoll.
This difficult scene is handled quite well by the S22 Ultra’s bokeh mode. Correctly, no blur was applied to the plant as it is in the same plane as the subject. In addition, the simulated opening creates a pleasant overall effect. Some artifacts of slight depth are visible. This is the same for the other devices which also apply a slight blur to the plant.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), slight depth artifacts but natural blur and simulated aperture
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), good depth estimate but some depth artifacts
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, good depth estimate but some depth artifacts
vidjo
144
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
146
Huawei P50 Pro
Huawei P50 Pro
Dwar SBMARK Selfie Video Tests
L-inġiniera ta 'SBMARK jaqbdu u jevalwaw aktar minn sagħtejn ta' vidjo f'ambjenti kkontrollati tal-laboratorju u xeni naturali f'kundizzjonijiet ta 'dawl baxx, ġewwa u barra, billi jużaw is-settings default tal-kamera ta' quddiem. Il-valutazzjoni tikkonsisti fl-ispezzjoni viżwali ta’ vidjows naturali meħuda taħt kundizzjonijiet varji u t-twettiq ta’ kejl oġġettiv fuq vidjows grafiċi rreġistrati fil-laboratorju taħt kundizzjonijiet differenti minn 2 sa 1+ lux u temperaturi tal-kulur minn 1000 K sa 2,300 K.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos) vs Ultra-Premium video scores
It-testijiet tal-vidjo janalizzaw l-istess attributi tal-kwalità tal-immaġini bħal immaġini fissi, bħall-espożizzjoni, il-kulur, in-nisġa jew il-ħoss, kif ukoll aspetti temporali bħall-veloċità, l-uniformità tal-espożizzjoni u l-istabbiltà, il-bilanċ tal-abjad, u t-tranżizzjonijiet tal-fokus awtomatiku.
Espożizzjoni
81
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
86
Apple iPhone 13 mini
Apple iPhone 13 mini
kulur
84
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
87
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro
It-testijiet tal-espożizzjoni jevalwaw il-luminożità tal-wiċċ u l-firxa dinamika, eż. il-ħila li tagħmel id-dettalji viżibbli kemm fiż-żoni ċari kif ukoll skuri tal-immaġni. L-istabbiltà u l-adattament temporali tal-espożizzjoni huma analizzati wkoll. L-analiżi tal-kulur tal-kwalità tal-immaġni teżamina l-konsenja tat-ton tal-ġilda, il-bilanċ tal-abjad, l-isfumatura tal-kulur, l-istabbiltà tal-bilanċ tal-abjad, u l-adattament tagħha meta jinbidel id-dawl.
In this video scene, the S22 Ultra produces accurate exposure with a good compromise between different skin tones and good retention of detail Cons the bright background. The dynamic range of the iPhone is wider but the exposure is rather dark.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), well balanced exposure, good background highlight retention
Apple iPhone 13, well balanced exposure, good background highlight retention
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, wider dynamic range and better highlight retention but underexposure on faces
Target exposure is slightly better than comparison devices in low light and quite similar to the S21 Ultra in bright conditions (slightly above target but still acceptable).
This graph shows the brightness measured on the 18% gray spot of the Colorchecker® graph versus the light level (in lux). The white area represents the region where the brightness is considered correct.
Video white balance on the S22 Ultra is cooler than on the iPhone, but skin tones look more natural than on the S21 Ultra predecessor.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), Natural complexion, neutral white balance
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), slightly less saturated skin tone, warm white balance
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, warmer white balance, beautiful skin tones
struttura
88
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
97
Asus ZenFone 6
Asus ZenFone 6
It-testijiet tal-konsistenza janalizzaw il-livell ta 'dettall u n-nisġa ta' vidjows tal-ħajja reali, kif ukoll vidjows tal-grafiċi rreġistrati fil-laboratorju. Ir-reġistrazzjonijiet tal-vidjo naturali huma evalwati viżwalment, b'attenzjoni partikolari għal-livell ta 'dettall tal-karatteristiċi tal-wiċċ. Kejl oġġettiv jitwettaq fuq immaġini ta’ graffs meħuda taħt diversi kundizzjonijiet minn 1 sa 1000 lux. It-tabella użata hija t-tabella tal-Weraq Mejjet.
The video texture measured on the S22 Ultra is similar to the S21 Ultra but noticeably superior to that of the iPhone 13 Pro Max.
This graph shows the texture and sharpness of the edge versus the light level (in lux). The texture and sharpness of the edge are measured on the deadleaves graph in the video deadleaves setting.
The texture level is higher for the S22 than for the S21 and similar to the iPhone.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), very good detail
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), good detail
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, very good details
storbju
64
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
83
Xiaomi mi 11 ultra
Xiaomi mi 11 ultra
It-testijiet tal-istorbju janalizzaw diversi attributi tal-istorbju bħall-intensità, il-kromatiċità, il-qamħa, in-nisġa, l-aspetti temporali fuq reġistrazzjonijiet tal-vidjo tal-ħajja reali u vidjows tal-grafiċi meħuda fil-laboratorju. Vidjows naturali huma evalwati viżwalment, b'attenzjoni partikolari għall-istorbju fuq l-uċuħ. Il-kejl oġġettiv jitwettaq fuq vidjows tal-kard irreġistrati taħt kundizzjonijiet varji minn 1 sa 1000 lux. Il-graff użat huwa l-graff tal-ħoss viżwali SBMARK.
Evoluzzjoni spazjali tal-ħoss viżwali bil-livell ta 'illuminanza
Din il-grafika turi l-evoluzzjoni tal-ħoss viżwali spazjali bil-livell tal-lux. Il-ħoss viżwali spazjali jitkejjel fuq il-graff tal-istorbju viżwali fl-issettjar tal-ħoss tal-vidjo. Il-kejl viżwali tal-ħoss SBMARK huwa derivat mill-istandard ISO15739.
Evoluzzjoni tal-ħin tal-ħoss viżwali bil-livell ta 'illuminanza
Din il-grafika turi l-evoluzzjoni tal-ħoss viżwali temporali bil-livell ta 'lux. Il-ħoss temporali viżwali jitkejjel fuq il-graff tal-istorbju viżwali fl-issettjar tal-ħoss tal-vidjo.
Video noise is well under control in indoor conditions and in low light conditions. The noise levels are lower than the competitors.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), noise well under control
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), more noise and underexposed
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, loud noise
The results that we can see in the clips above are confirmed by our laboratory measurements. The noise levels on the S22 Ultra in the lab are lower than on the iPhone 13 Pro Max.
This graph shows temporal visual noise and the chromaticity ratio of temporal noise to light level (in lux). The temporal visual noise and the chromaticity ratio of the noise are measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setting.
istabbilizzazzjoni
74
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
82
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Il-valutazzjoni tal-istabbilizzazzjoni tivverifika l-abbiltà tal-apparat li jistabbilizza l-filmati bl-użu ta’ teknoloġiji ta’ softwer jew ħardwer bħal OIS, EIS, jew kwalunkwe mezz ieħor. Il-valutazzjoni teżamina l-moviment residwu ġenerali fuq il-wiċċ u l-isfond, l-intoppi u l-artifacts tal-ġelatina, waqt każijiet ta 'użu ta' mixi u panning taħt diversi kundizzjonijiet tad-dawl. Il-video hawn taħt huwa silta minn waħda mix-xeni ttestjati.
While stabilization works well when holding the camera still, it’s not very effective when moving around while recording. There is still a lot of residual camera movement in the footage. The S22 Ultra is worse than both comparison devices in this respect.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), ineffective stabilization on the go
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos), better stabilization
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, better stabilization
Oġġetti manifatturati
88
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
tnejn u disgħin
Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple iPhone 12 mini
L-artifacts huma evalwati b'kejl MTF u ċirku fuq il-grafika SFR fil-laboratorju, kif ukoll kejl tar-rata tal-qafas bl-użu tal-Universal Timer LED. Vidjows naturali huma evalwati viżwalment b'attenzjoni speċjali għall-artifacts bħal kwantizzazzjoni, bidla fil-lewn, u artifacts li jirrendu l-wiċċ, fost oħrajn. Iktar ma jkun sever u frekwenti l-artifatt, iktar ikun kbir it-tnaqqis tal-punt mill-punteġġ. L-artifacts ewlenin u t-telf tal-punt korrispondenti huma elenkati hawn taħt
Pieni ewlenin għal artifacts tal-vidjo
Anamorphosis (perspective distortion) can sometimes be evident on faces near the edge of the frame. In this clip, this is especially noticeable on the face on the right.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos), anamorphosis at the edge of the frame
Ibda Thread ġdid